Friday, December 23, 2005

Test team of 2005

The end of yet another year is upon us and the usual year-end summaries have started flowing in. Here, Peter Roebuck puts together what he believes is the best Test team based on performances this year.

I think Inzamam and Flintoff would be unarguable choices. Both of them have put in stellar performances repeatedly this year. What irks me most about the team though is the choice of Matthew Hayden as opener. He was pathetic all through the Ashes and just because he hammered a few centuries against the worthless Windies bowling lineup doesn't make 2005 a great year for him. I think Langer had a much better year than Hayden. He always looked solid and never looked out of sorts like Hayden did through the Ashes.

The other controversial pick is Ponting. Roebuck picks him based on his match-saving innings at Trent Bridge. But, he conveniently forgets that Pietersen scored a much more important knock in the final Test. If Ponting hadn't scored that century at Trent Bridge, Australia would have lost the match but it wouldn't have affected the outcome of the Ashes. Whereas, if Pietersen had failed at The Oval, the Ashes would most probably still be with the Aussies. I'm not saying Pietersen should have been picked but I certainly don't think Ponting had a great year. A better pick at one-drop would have been Younis Khan. He had two superlative series in India and West Indies and put to rest all doubts over his abilities.

I'm not sure why Pathan is the twelfth man btw. He didn't do anything extra-ordinary in Tests. I would have picked Danish Kaneria instead. He proved beyond doubt that he can win matches for Pakistan on his own. Until last year, when asked to name which bowler in the Pakistan team could run through the opposition, the only one who would come to mind is Akhtar. Kaneria's performances against Australia, India and England this year have added him to that list. The only reason I wouldn't include him in the XI though is Warne is still miles ahead of him!

As is clear from my arguments, I believe Pakistan has all the makings for dominating 2006. Though England stole the limelight this year with victory in the Ashes, I believe Pakistan will be the team of year 2006. Let's hope India will be the team of the year 2007 in the ODIs atleast :P

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So who are your best XI? Worst XI?
Overrated XI? Underrated XI? ...

4:07 PM  
Blogger nice try said...

over-rated eleven:

1. virender sehwag
2. gautam gambhir
3. yuvraj singh
4. mohammed kaif
5. vvs laxman
6. sourav ganguly
7. ms dhoni
8. zaheer khan
9. murali kartik
10. harbhajan singh
11. agarkar

11:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home