Wednesday, November 30, 2005

The games of childhood

This is a pretty old post, but thought it might strike a chord with others too. I don't really have much to add to it. Just read the post and my rather detailed comment that summarizes an outpouring of some of the memories from my childhood that this post elicited. Would be interested to know if any of you have similar tales to tell from your childhood.

Update:

Yet another blog entry on similar veins on Cricinfo's blog Different Strokes.

Ganguly!

Much like it was the case with Azhar during the final stages of his career (before it was clipped by the match-fixing scandal), Ganguly's batting has been the bone of contention among Indian cricket fans for almost a couple of years now. When he first made it into the team, he was the "God" of the offside and whenever a bowler made the folly of putting the ball on a good/over-pitched length outside the off-stump, you could be guaranteed that Ganguly would collect yet another boundary. However, in the last 2 years or so, the going has become tough for Ganguly with bowlers almost always sticking to a length that is short or just short of a good length against him. To add to his woes, he seemed to have lost that golden touch through the offside even on over-pitched/good length stuff. But, no one could have expected things to have gotten so out of hand for him as it has after his infamous press conference during the Zimbabwe tour. He somehow managed to acquire a timely case of "tennis-elbow" after the BCCI "efficiently" resolved the squabble between him and Chappell, which made it convenient for the selectors to leave him out of the team.

Team India, after its horrid run in ODIs since the 2003 World Cup, surprisingly got its act together right after Ganguly was left out. And so, this clearly made it tough for the selectors to bring him back after he had recovered from his supposed injury. Bongs made such a hue and cry about it that all that they achieved was to bring themselves to shame. Everyone, from the West Bengal CM to the actress Rupa Ganguly (of "Draupadi" fame) got into the act of heralding their golden boy, Sourav Ganguly. Without having access to the local media in Bengal, it's anybody's guess whether this represented the opinion of the majority in Bengal, but considering the booing that reportedly Dravid and even the lord of Indian cricket, Sachin, were subjected to in the Kolkata ODI, that does seem to the case.

The selectors finally wilted under pressure and brought Ganguly back into the Test side. And things would have been fine after a day or two if not for Kiran More's stupid remark that they had included him in the team as a "batting all-rounder", and that too at the expense of Zaheer Khan. Bah! A few wickets in Duleep and Ranji Trophy doesn't maketh an all-rounder. As Harsha Bhogle rightly points out in his latest column, Ganguly certainly doesn't deserve humiliation in this form of having to make it back into the Indian side as an all-rounder. To make matters worse, Sharad Pawar, the BCCI's new President, when asked about Ganguly's future, had this to say:
He’s one of the best allrounders the country has seen. However, it will be the selectors’ decision (about his inclusion in the team).
Ganguly must be in tears!

This whole episode has actually changed my sentiments towards Ganguly from apathy to sympathy. He has undoubtedly been India's best captain and the second best Indian batsmen in ODIs. His batting skills might have waned, in which case, please just drop him and get done with this. But, please don't term him "one of the best allrounder the country has seen"! Anyway, let us see what he has to offer in the first Test against Sri Lanka. Irrespective of whether he does make it into the playing eleven or not, he will certainly be mocked at either knowingly or unknowingly.

Pity Ganguly!

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

NFL isn't all that bad!

After coming to the US, I took to basketball within a very short span of time. I've watched more NBA matches than cricket matches in the past couple of years (though I certainly track cricket more closely in the online media). And, I think I would go so far as to say that I would rate any NBA game that involves any two of Suns, Sonics, Spurs, Heat and Pistons to be more exciting than an ODI, even if it involves India! I have certainly not followed baseball as closely, but I do watch it on TV when there isn't a sitcom or a good movie on air at that time. Though it's a pretty boring game, it's better than all those crappy reality shows.

However, I have totally kept away from the other two American sports - football and ice hockey ... until now. I still have pretty much no clue about ice hockey; other than that there was no season last year because the players were on strike :P But, I have started getting into football over the past couple of weeks. Till now, what annoyed me about football is that every play is just a few seconds long. A play that lasts even as long as 10 seconds is possible only if it results in a touchdown. And in addition, I did not have a keen appreciation for the finer points of the game, which btw I still don't have :)

Thanks to Google News however, I have been following the Terrell Owens saga pretty closely since before last season's Super Bowl (those of you who haven't heard of Terrell Owens, go take a hike! ... Or, maybe I'll write a post about him sometime later this week), and that is what initially attracted me into watching a few of the Philadelphia Eagles' games this seasons. And, I found the games to be pretty much like an ODI in Eden Gardens! The crowds are really huge (yesterday's game between the Eagles and the Redskins had a crowd of 90,000!) and they keep roaring all the time. The intensity of the crowd in turn is reflected on the field as well. Though each play lasts for just a few seconds, the tension among the players is clearly palpable, which is what makes it exciting to watch. However, I still am nowhere near becoming a regular follower. I don't even know all the teams that are in the NFL :( I understand only the basic workings of the game, and don't know any of the standard positions other than quarterback and receiver (have heard of others like line-backer and safety, but have no clue what their roles are). I also know the names of only handful of players; how can anyone love a sport without knowing who the stars are :)

Anyway, it certainly looks like my love affair with the NFL has begun. With time, as I gain more insight into the game, it should certainly make more rivetting viewing. Who knows ... maybe I'll begin with the NHL too next year :P

Cheers,
Harsha

Saturday, November 05, 2005

The power of money

Just take a look at the English Premier League now and what it was a couple of years back. Who would have even imagined that Chelsea would become such a dominant side? All that mattered back then was Arsenal vs. ManU. Chelsea was just one more team among the also-rans. If Mourinho had been coaching Chelsea back then, I'm sure Wenger would have cared two hoots about his comments. (For the uninformed, Jose Mourinho and Arsene Wenger are the current coaches of Chelsea and Arsenal, respectively. I hope I don't need to add that Sir Alex Ferguson is the coach of Manchester United!) But, now with Chelsea being the only unbeaten team in the league, obviously Mourinho is the man on whom all the limelight is on. So, when he calls Wenger a "voyeur" obviously it has to be big news; he can no more be dismissed as just another madman.

And the reason for this drastic change in just two years is because of the limitless funds that Chelsea has its disposal now with Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich having bought the team. Now, they can afford to buy as many players as they wish without concern for the moolah that the team manages to rake in via game tickets, endorsements, sales of merchandise, etc. I really pity the other teams in the league. How can they be even expected to compete with Chelsea in such circumstances? Whenever any player has a great season, you can rest assured that Chelsea will certainly consider buying him. Even Steven Gerrard almost gave in to the temptation after scaling the heights at Liverpool by winning the Champions League last season. If this continues any longer, they might as well not have any matches in the league and hand the championship to Chelsea forever!

And all this because of Abramovich's billions. The power of Oil has come to dictate sport as well now. What a sad state to be in? The only reason to have any hope is that ManU too has been bought over by a billionaire! And this time by an American, Malcolm Glazer (who incidentally owns a team in the NFL as well, Tampa Bay Buccaneers). Wow, the Cold War will be fought all over again - this time in the English Premier League :-) Until now, ManU haven't made any really big acquisitions other than that of Rooney from Everton. If they continue to play like they did this week - they lost to Middlesborough in the Premier League and an unheard of French team, called Lille, in the Champions League - we could soon see the power of money coming into play at ManU as well pretty soon. And then, every year, we'll have the English Premier League decided by the bidding wars that ManU and Chelsea have at the start of the season.

The only way out to maintain any sense of parity between different teams seems to be either
1. Put up every team in the league as being on sale to be bought by a billionaire, or
2. Introduce a salary cap system

They better make the obvious choice soon or shut down the Premiership ...

(I apologize for any errors in spelling out all these crazy names!)

Cheers,
Harsha